Kashia Band of Pomo Indians
This tribe operates 3 tribal lending brands through Kashia Services — 3 still lending and 0 closed. Across the portfolio, APRs span 400–780%.
Active brands
What this portfolio actually costs a borrower
APR is an abstraction until it has a dollar attached. Of the 3 brands we attribute to the Kashia Band of Pomo Indians, 2 publish a rate we could source, and those run 400–780%. At the top of that range, $1,000 borrowed over twelve months repays about $7,819 — $6,819 of it interest. That ceiling sits below the 795% median across every tribal lender we hold a rate for.
The remaining 1 brand never published a rate we could verify. We leave those out of the range rather than estimate them, which is why the span above covers 2 of 3 brands and not all of them.
The earliest brand here dates to 2019. Brands in this industry rebrand and relaunch constantly, so a name disappearing rarely means the lending stopped — check the closed list above for successors.
Kashia Band of Pomo Indians lending — frequently asked
Which lenders does the Kashia Band of Pomo Indians own?
We document 3 lending brands attributed to the Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of CA: Blue Mountain Loans, Inbox Loan, Better Day Loans. 3 are still lending and 0 have closed. The lending business is run through Kashia Services, which is the entity that appears in filings rather than the tribe itself.
What APR do Kashia Band of Pomo Indians lenders charge?
Across the 2 Kashia Band of Pomo Indians brands that publish a rate, APRs span 400–780%. At the top of that range, borrowing $1,000 for twelve months costs about $7,819 to repay — $6,819 of it interest. That ceiling sits below the 795% median across every tribal lender we hold a rate for. 1 of the tribe's brands never published a rate we could source, so they are excluded from that range rather than estimated.
Is Kashia Services the same as the Kashia Band of Pomo Indians?
No, and the distinction matters. Kashia Services is the operating entity named in filings; the tribe is the sovereign that charters it. Courts have repeatedly looked past the tribal name on the door to ask who actually funds the loans, sets the rates and takes the profit — which is the test that decided cases like the Western Sky and CashCall litigation.
Do I still owe a Kashia Band of Pomo Indians loan?
It depends on where you live, not on what you signed. A tribal loan that exceeds your state's rate cap may be void or uncollectable regardless of the contract terms, and we have no record of a settlement cancelling this tribe's balances. Check your state's rules before you keep paying.
Ownership is verified against each brand's own disclosures, state regulator alerts and court filings. Where a non-tribal operator is named in litigation, we list it above — the lending LLC and the tribe are not always the party actually running the business.
Most tribal brands are one of several run by the same tribe, often through the same non-tribal operator. See the full picture: which tribe owns which lender?